E/e? proportion together with visibility from SBI

E/e? proportion together with visibility from SBI

Echocardiographic data for all patients are shown in Table 2. Conventional echocardiographic examination demonstrated that there were no significant differences in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimension, LV ejection fraction, LV wall thickness (IVS and PW), LVM index, LA diameter, and the LA volume index between the two groups. Patients with SBI had significantly higher E-wave velocities on transmitral Doppler flow (81 ± 26 vs. 70 ± 18 cm/s; P = 0.003) and lower e? velocities on TDI (6.3 ± 1.7 vs. 7.3 ± 2.1 cm/s; P = 0.003) than those without SBI. Consequently, the E/e? ratio was higher in patients with SBI than in those without SBI (13.6 ± 5.6 vs. 10.1 ± 3.2; P < 0.001). As to TOE parameters, patients with SBI had higher prevalences of SEC (P < 0.001) and complex arch plaques (P = 0.003), and a lower LAA emptying velocity (P = 0.005) than those without SBI.

Elizabeth, diastolic very early transmitral move speed; e?, diastolic early mitral annular velocity; E/e?, diastolic early transmitral disperse speed/mitral annular acceleration; Los angeles, left atrial; LAA, left atrial appendage; LV, left ventricular; LVDd, LV prevent-diastolic proportions; LVDs, LV prevent-systolic proportions; LVEF, LV ejection tiny fraction; IVS, interventricular septal wall surface occurrence; PW, rear wall surface occurrence; SEC, spontaneous reflect evaluate.

Elizabeth, diastolic early transmitral move speed; e?, diastolic very early mitral annular velocity; E/e?, diastolic very early transmitral circulate acceleration/mitral annular velocity; La, leftover atrial; LAA, remaining atrial appendage; LV, remaining ventricular; LVDd, LV avoid-diastolic size; LVDs, LV end-systolic proportions; LVEF, LV ejection small fraction; IVS, interventricular septal wall structure occurrence; PW, posterior wall occurrence; SEC, spontaneous mirror evaluate.

E/e? proportion and transoesophageal echocardiographic parameters

We divided the study patients into three groups based on the tertile of the E/e? ratio (the lowest tertile: <9.0, the intermediate tertile: 9.0–12.1, the highest tertile: >12.1). An increased tertile of the E/e? ratio was significantly associated with a high prevalence of LA abnormalities (P =0.002) and decreased LAA velocity (P < 0.001) (Figure 2). Patients with the highest tertile of E/e? had a significantly higher prevalence of LA abnormalities than those with the intermediate (P = 0.023) or the lowest tertile of the E/e? ratio (P = 0.005) (32% vs. 12% vs. 9%), and they had a lower LAA emptying velocity than those with the intermediate or the lowest tertile of E/e? (P < 0.001 for both) (Figure 2). 19% vs. 7%) (P = 0.082)

No high relationship is actually observed between an increased tertile of your own E/e? proportion and you can a high prevalence regarding advanced arc plaques (21% compared to

Prevalences of SBI according datingranking.net/es/citas-indio to tertiles of the E/e? ratio in non-valvular AF patients. An increased tertile of E/e? was associated with a high prevalence of SBI (P < 0.001). Patients with the highest tertile of E/e? had a significantly higher prevalence of SBI than those with the intermediate (**P = 0.020 vs. the highest tertile) or the lowest tertile of E/e? (*P < 0.001 vs. the highest tertile).

No high dating try seen anywhere between a greater tertile of the E/e? proportion and a premier frequency away from cutting-edge arch plaques (21% compared to

Prevalences of SBI according to tertiles of the E/e? ratio in non-valvular AF patients. An increased tertile of E/e? was associated with a high prevalence of SBI (P < 0.001). Patients with the highest tertile of E/e? had a significantly higher prevalence of SBI than those with the intermediate (**P = 0.020 vs. the highest tertile) or the lowest tertile of E/e? (*P < 0.001 vs. the highest tertile).

The increased tertile of E/e? was related to a high prevalence of SBI (P < 0.001), and SBI was found more frequently in patients with the highest tertile of the E/e? ratio than in those with the intermediate (P = 0.020) or the lowest tertile (P < 0.001) (46% vs. 23% vs. 14%) (Figure 3). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that 12.4 was the optimal cut-off value of E/e? for predicting SBI (area under the curve 0.72) with 55% sensitivity and 80% specificity (Figure 4).

Fermer le menu
×
×

Panier